The Use of Verbs

Comments

[this is good]

These are really, really good questions. With technological advances we are almost becoming 'god-like' in our decision-making process and in our capabilities. We can articifically keep someone alive and we also have the power to terminate that artificial way of keeping them alive. Where is the line drawn. Should we even dare draw the line? So much we can do to prolong life. So many questions you bring up. So many I ask myself. I visit my Grandmother everyday in a place that has a rehab wing, an Alzheimer's wing, assisted-living wing, apartments for those more able-bodies that need little assistance. I come in contact with those in varying degrees of disability and illness. Makes me ponder just those questions you bring up.

I've had many questions about life, longevity, quality, technological assistance, the pros and cons.

For the most part, we all have a God-given built-in innate desire to live. God has also given us the smarts and gifts for these advances. Is it all good? Longevity vs. quality? Who decides what's 'quality'?

My own opinion right now is that I personally have an obligation and a DESIRE to do whatever I can to provide the best for my loved one. Of course, I know when I say that there are a slew of other unanswered questions that follow that statement.

I agree with you, on ‘I wonder if our arguments for the right to exist shouldn't be based on being verbs.’ I have one friend with Down’s, and I would hate the idea if someone said to me that she was less than human. I hate to bring up the Nazis because there is a theory that all arguments, if serious enough, will wind up with them being cited, but they began with euthanasing certain groups (e.g. the intellectually handicapped) in their quest for the Master Race. Unfortunately, this extended to genocide—the theory being that if people tolerate the euthanasia of one group, they will gradually be open to the genocide of another.
There are a few ways to look at the disabled. The first is that they give us the opportunity to experience an element of Godliness. I purposely use the Father’s name here. He does not judge any of us and loves us all equally. Knowing people who society classes as ‘disabled’ or differently abled is a training ground for seeing if we can remove our prejudices and extend the same love to them. The second is to understand that on a spiritual plane they are equal to us. None of us can say that a disabled Christian is any less a Christian or has any less of the Holy Spirit running through him or her. This can be extended to other religions or to atheists as God views us all equally on that spiritual level.
Susan’s questions are difficult to answer about artificial way of keeping someone alive. I do not really know the answer here. I know I was instinctively against the removal of Terri Schiavo’s feeding tube. Susan, I completely agree with your conclusion: we must each do what we feel is right, and not live with any regret that we did not do enough to help a fellow human being.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in